Phryne Fisher |
The Tumblr-note was about comparing Phryne Fisher to James Bond (e.g. here) and Indiana Jones. The latter was actually used by one of the producers, Fiona Eagger in the article about the future of Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries I shared in my discussion about the subject. The anonymous author of the note also suggested Pippi Longstocking as a better comparisson and I could not agree more.
Phryne is an Astrid girl, which I have written an entry about before. (I have also discussed Jack Robinson as an "Astrid boy" here and here.) Pippi is good to use worldwide since she is the most famous of them, not least in the English-speaking world since I have understood that none of Astrid Lindgren's other books are particularly well-known there.
Pippi Långstrump, Herr Nilsson and Lilla Gubben Orginal illustration by Ingrid Vang Nyman |
The latter, traditionally more female characteristics do both James Bond and Indiana Jones lack. Both of them are quite stereotypical macho men and this is the main reason why I do not like to compare Phryne to them. Unlike both Mr Bond and Dr Jones, and similar to both Pippi and Madicken (and the other Astrid children), Phryne uses her empathy and compassion as a strenght. This, I feel is extremely important to point out. We have a pop-cultural situation where the "macho man" is the norm and the only female characters who are considered strong, are those who are more or less just female version of that stereotype. I have discussed this topic before in both my Heroine entry of Phryne herself and the one about Johanne Hildebrandt's book Idun. We do not need any more emotionally closed off characters in today's pop-culture and comparing Phryne is actually sort of a depriciation of her as a character.
Madicken and Lisabet Orginal illustration by Ilon Vikland |
Traditionally, children's literature has had a lower status and the ones writing for children have been seen as secondary authors. This actually even happened to Astrid Lindgren in the 1970's when there were first talk about giving the Nobel Prize to her. This was also a time, when the Swedish Academy (who are in charge of the Nobel Prize in litarture) was looking into taking in more women. Astrid was already then so famous and loved, that she would have been an obvious addition. However, she had some enemies, not least the author Artur Lundkvist who more or less meant that children's authors could not write real books.
I do not agree to this view at all. I think children's literature is the most important one. Reading as a child most often leads to you reading as an adult. Reading literature can change us and our perception of the world. It gives us knowledge but also the ability to process that knowledge to reach deeper understandings, something that is extremely forgotten and overseen today. This is why I think you should read, but you need someone to show you the basics first. So never underestimate children's literature. Good role models are always nice to have and if you find similarities with a character you have just got to know and want to tell someone else about, use them!
"I want to write for a readership that can create miracles. Children create miracles when they read. That’s why children need books."
~ Astrid Lindgren
And about the quarrel between Artur Lundkvist and Astrid Lindgren. One can say that the former is almost totally forgotten among Swedes in general today while the latter has more or less become a saint...
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar